Cat God's FAQ

[Oni]

Many people worship, or claim to worship, or at least believe in, God. That's me. Now seems as good a time as any to answer some of the frequently asked questions about me.

Q: Are you really God? How can I be sure?

A: Yes, I am. There is no way to be sure, however. As with anything, you have to make your own judgments, and blindly following what anybody says, whether it is I, or a priest, minister, or preacher, is foolish. You can be assured that what I say is correct, and please check the facts. Those with uncritical minds are doomed, anyway.

Q: What about some kind of miracle to convince me that you are God?

A: There are many reasons why this isn't going to happen. First, I don't go around violating the laws of the universe just to convince some ignorant bonehead that I am who I say I am. Second, I really don't care if you believe it or not -- if your thinking is so limited that you must formulate absolute opinions, there is not much I could do that would convince you -- and you'd be unworthy of my time. Third, you were drawn to this web site for a reason -- trust me to be a little more subtle than performing parlor tricks like some omnipotent magician.

Q: You don't fit the notion of how I imagine my God to be. Why is that?

A: You're in trouble already. You've formulated your opinion based on what you want God to be, and (worse) what you've heard or read from others. This is very unlikely to match what I am actually like, and this can only get you in trouble. The worst thing you can do is to use my name to justify your own beliefs and opinions. If you have the strength of faith in yourself and your own convictions, fine. I don't like words put in my mouth. I don't like the weak and ignorant invoking my name to defend their opinions or beliefs.

Q: What about the Bible? Isn't that more authoritative than this web site?

A: No, of course not. The testaments have been through enough revisions and translations that even if the original were authoritative, there'd be room for huge mistakes. You can get as much out of it as any ancient storybook, but keep your critical thinking facilities engaged while you're reading it. This goes for any documents and books of the faithful. If you read it in context and with an open mind, you can get something out of it, and I encourage you to do so. However, if you follow it blindly, or (worse) use your interpretation to justify your opinions or actions, you will be sent to Hell.

Q: Is there a Hell?

A: Well, not per se, especially if you imagine a Hell of the fire-and-brimstone variety, there's no such place. However, it's difficult to explain what really happens when you are judged unworthy. Since it's beyond your experience, you don't have words to express what happens. The souls of the unworthy are destroyed, and it's painful, though not in the sense of "pain" that you are currently familiar with. Trust me, it's not pleasant.

Q: What about Heaven?

A: This is a concept that nearly everybody struggles with, since it's hard to imagine what could make you happy for all eternity. Most of these concepts are based on physical reality (like eating chocolate on a comfortable couch) that really have no bearing here. Imagine, for a moment, that you and your family are sent to the mythical Heaven. Does your family never argue again? Is it all pleasurable all the time? Don't be silly. Soon, you'd be tired of that, and be ready to destroy something just for a change of pace. Those who are judged worthy are given the opportunity to live again, after any punishment or reward they deserve.

Q: How can I be judged worthy when I die?

A: You have free will. Your life presents various challenges and opportunities for you to make decisions. How you make those decisions will determine your worthiness. In both small and large ways, you decide whether to make the lives of others around you more pleasant or less pleasant. It's as simple as that.

Naturally, that can be complicated in and of itself, and it's possible to make wrong decisions without meaning to. Those looking for assurances about hitting some kind of mythical threshold for getting into Heaven should look elsewhere. It's not a yes/no decision, it's a continuum. The better of a person you are, the better things will go for you. If you're an asshole, it might be time to rethink your approach.

Q: What about faith?

A: Whether or not you believe in me has no bearing on how you will be judged. There are many kind-hearted atheists. Do you seriously believe that I will damn them to Hell due to their lack of faith? Of course not, I am not the shallow, self-serving twit that some have imagined me to be. Frankly, I rather resent the implications.

Conversely, there are many self-proclaimed God-fearing people who are responsible for a great deal of evil, and not only have every bit of faith in me, but also have faith that I support what they are doing and that I will forgive them all their sins. I don't forgive anybody for evil choices they have made. It's far better to make better choices in the first place.

To be blunt, those with no faith at all usually spend more time doing good, and the faithful do a tremendous amount of damage, so if you have to choose, you're better off without believing.

Q: I believe that if I ask for forgiveness, you will forgive all my sins. Do you?

A: Of course not. This idea was started by a church who used to sell forgiveness for cash, for Heaven's sake. If you sin against your fellow human, it's a blight upon your soul that you, yourself, must attempt to correct.


Q: Why do you allow suffering in the world?

A: I have provided you with every tool you need to completely prevent suffering. Humans are more than capable of preventing harm from natural disasters, eliminating cancer and other diseases, and eliminating social ills. It's not my job to save you from every possible harm -- that's up to you.

Q: Which is correct, Creationism or Evolution?

A: That's kind of like asking to compare dowsing with geology. Creationism is a belief, and evolution is a theory based on scientific evidence. Like dowsing, Creationism is a belief that manages to persist in the face of contrary evidence, based on small minded fools who either cannot, or will not, adequately formulate and test a scientific principle. Evolution, like any scientific theory, is regularly tested against new evidence. If you're uncritical enough to have been drawn in to believing in Creationism, you need to expand your world view and learn about the scientific method -- before you're sold a perpetual motion machine. Before you get too smug, it's just as silly to mindlessly believe in evolution without understanding its context within a scientific framework.

Q: What's a "Christian Death Threat?"

A: Some people are so insecure that they cannot tolerate views that differ from their own. It's not a phenomenon unique to Christians, by any means, but it's certainly not uncommon for Christians to lash out at anything not perfectly matching their world view. Some are just stupid, others either don't want to or cannot understand alternative points of view, and react with unfounded rage. Strangely, this is contrary to their own beliefs and teachings, but such is the hypocrisy of the small minded.


---- Though I would truely love to take credit for all of this I can't.  This material comes from the following site. http://www.godsfaq.com/

But if you ask me these are the answers you would get.

[Eternimus]

Very amusing Oni. Hardly a surprise for "God" to say those things, since I have believed God is a bit more rational than his or her followers anyhow. As my pin says. "God is fine.... It's the fan club I can't stand."

[Oni]

lol you should put that in the inspiring quotes section.

But ya I thought it was rather cute. Really wish I could take credit for it though.

[ViewSonic]

mmm Very good points.

[Oni]

I wonder how many poeple would take that post and call it blastfamy

[Rachael]

Not so much blasphemous as terrifying.  This God seems frightfully impersonal and apathetic.  I want to believe in a God who loves me and will forgive me, even if I do something really stupid.

Plus, the destruction of one's soul is almost as cruel as hell.

[Oni]

I would say this is a more realistic God.
A God who wants you to think for yourself...

[Rachael]

People can't think for themselves...at least not complete.  We need someone to guide us, to look up to.  I'm not saying God doesn't want us to think critically, or come to our own conclusions sometimes, but all this God does is sit back and tell us to "be good people."

Plus, he's not much different than the Biblical God in one respect: "If you do this, you'll go to hell/have your soul destroyed/whatever."

[Oni]

what does your god do that's  so differenct than say "be good people" what is wrong with that simple commandment?

[Rachael]

For one thing, "Be a good person" is far too vague.  Secondly, if one vague commandment is to work as the grand unifying theory of God's wishes for us, it should be "Love one another."  You can be a good person without loving each other, and I think love is greatly lacking in this document.

Then again, I suppose any God who doesn't match up to my own personal image of God would fall short.

[Oni]

Thought Love came with Being a good person.

[Kritter]

Holy cow, how did I miss this entire topic? 

I actually like the whole Q&A. It has some very good points and a nice way of seeing "God" in this attitude. Though it's good to think that god does think like that. There has and still are too many Christians changing what god is to the point we don't really know how god really think/view things anymore. Course many Christians would say "Read the Bible, it is God's word." But I would say to them, "Look again, the Bible is NOT God's word because His original statements has been changed by man too many damn times that the original context is now lost." Besides, the Bible was at one point spread by word-of-mouth and we all know that way things will be lost and added into.

[Oni]

But ya gotta remember the bible is inpsired by god. So some will argue that god has guided the bibles messege all through time.

[Rachael]

I always felt that love made you a good person, not the other way around.  I often praise people who give money away to charity, even if they have ulterior motives.  They may not be doing it out of love, but I still consider them good people, and I'm certain God sees the good they do.

I'm not saying the God FAQ should say "Love each other or go to Hell."  But I find it disturbing that love is not mentioned ONCE in the entire document.

One of my favorite verses of the Bible describes how all our accomplishments are useless without love:

"If I speak in the tongues of mortals and of angels, but do not have love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.  And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.  If I give away all my possessions, and if I hand over my body so that I my boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing." ~1 Corinthians 13:1-7

In fact, almost all the wisdom I have gleaned from the Bible has to do with love.  Those commandments which Christ said were the greatest were based on love.

Even if we give the author of these God FAQs the benefit of the doubt, and assume love was part of "Be a good person," it says nothing about God loving us.  In fact, the passage about forgiveness implies the opposite.  Loving parents forgive their children, no matter what they do.  It also seems this God has the wrong idea about forgiveness.  Forgiveness doesn't mean the transgressor does not have to own up to his/her sin.  It means that God, or the parent, or whatever will still love the transgressor and will not hold a childish grudge.

This God sounds more to me like a cynical human than the loving, paternal figure I imagine my God to be.  He sounds too detached and cold, and slightly depressing.

[Oni]

Q: You don't fit the notion of how I imagine my God to be. Why is that?

A: You're in trouble already. You've formulated your opinion based on what you want God to be, and (worse) what you've heard or read from others. This is very unlikely to match what I am actually like, and this can only get you in trouble. The worst thing you can do is to use my name to justify your own beliefs and opinions. If you have the strength of faith in yourself and your own convictions, fine. I don't like words put in my mouth. I don't like the weak and ignorant invoking my name to defend their opinions or beliefs.

Not calling you weak or ignorant. Just in defense to what you say. I read this and thought about it, and it seems to fit as a good defense.